Changes of the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005
As can be seen from the map, the seaside resort of Templeton experienced significant change from 1990 to 2005.
In 1990, the resort was a quite and undeveloped place with many trees and individual houses, but during the next 15 years the resort was developed dramatically.
Firstly, the biggest change is that all the invidiual houses in the south-west of the seaside were demolished, with all the trees chopped down and replaced by a supermaket and apartnents. Moreover, a new residental with apartments and the dwellings were built around the lake and supermarket. Only a few trees were remained. Furthermore, all the trees east of the resort was cleared to made way for an airportand some houses, which sprang up around the school and hospital. The woodland and some houses in the south-east of the seaside was replaced by a factory. In addition, a new stretch of the railway along the shore running from east to west. Another, a ferry was also established to transport vehicles.
Overall, there was a complete transformation of this area, the seaside resort of Templeton-from rural village to a mainly urban landscape.
- Topic: in about 250-word essay expressing your opinion about the following topic:“Technology has made the world a better place to live.”You should use facts, examples, or logical reasons to support your opinion. Write it in about 40 minutes 68
- Changes of the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 79
- The maps show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25 year period from 1980 to 2005 What is the most noticeable difference between the two maps 42
- The maps show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25 year period from 1980 to 2005. What is the most noticeable difference between the two maps? 78
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 937.175257732 101% => OK
No of words: 187.0 206.0 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05347593583 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92872424785 2.54303337028 115% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 127.690721649 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572192513369 0.622605031667 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 290.88556701 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 0.824742268041 970% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3695933418 44.8134815571 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 76.5299724578 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 16.8248392259 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 4.34317383033 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.94845360825 203% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263332783444 0.216113520407 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936471386316 0.0766984524023 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123429504449 0.0603063233224 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201990632897 0.12726935374 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129971953357 0.0580467560999 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 8.37731958763 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 70.7449484536 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 8.71597938144 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 7.59969072165 114% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 41.2886597938 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 8.62886597938 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.