Do you agree or disagree? asking children to work in small groups is the best way to teach young children.
In this modern life, there are monumental amounts of techniques which both parents and teachers can exercise in order to teach young children. Personally speaking, it is my firm conviction that one of the best way to teach young children is asking them to work in small groups due to some reasons. I will elaborate upon the momentous reasons in the following paragraphs.
The first point worth mentioning would be that the learning process would be much more appealing whenever people work in groups, young children in particular. It is crystal-clear that working with each other can make the process of learning less boring, even appealing. A prime example of my nephew's experience may shade some light on this point. My sister wanted to teach him how to play an instrument; even though he was interested in playing a musical instrument but he became tired most of the time during his sessions and his attention wandered around the room. In order to solve this serious problem, my nephew took a class in which he had to have a play with several other children. Not only did not he become bored during the class, but also he fully enjoyed the class and could keep his attention inasmuch as he was with several children. In a word, having jointed a group, children are able to pay enough attention to the class and have a delight full experience with a circle of their friends.
There is a more subtle point we must consider. While working in a group, the performance of young children increase. Needless to say that young children like others can consult with each other and ask help from their friends when grasping a new material is so hard for them. The direct outcome of consulting is a substantial increase in their performances. To exemplify, when I was an elementary school student, my classmates and I had to study in groups; not only could we have a healthy competition with each other, but also we could receive help from each other. As an instance, I was born not with a genetic flair for math, but by studying in groups I showed a marked improvement in my scores. By dint of studying in the group we all gained high marks for most of our lessens. Had we studied alone, we could not have been as successful as we were at that time. Therefore, working in a group is a key to success for the young children as well as others.
In the final analysis, according to above-mentioned points, it is a forgeon conclusion that asking children to work in small groups can help students inasmuch as it is much more fun and also students can learn far better while learning with several other children. Then, why not accept this fact that the more group works, the more success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-20 | Orange Dots | 73 | view |
| 2017-09-04 | fereshtehRR | 73 | view |
| 2016-12-30 | Hamed.Baghal | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public. 70
- do you agree or disagree? The way people dresses is a good indication of his or her personality or character? 73
- TPO48 78
- TPO47 81
- You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you do not like, should you still be friends with him or her? 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, in particular, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2214.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6512605042 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5701959203 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497899159664 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.0 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3339070538 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.428571429 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09523809524 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273691111492 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921706540872 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11319707295 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201473715264 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923396127988 0.0645574589148 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.