Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to hold a big party and invite many people to come than a small party where only a few close friends and family members are invited.
We, as human beings, are social creatures, and have always the tendency to spend time with people in order to heal our pains of living. One of the most common ways of doing so is through holding parties. In this regard, people have different tastes. While some people are inclined to hold big parties and invite many people to them, others enjoy the small parties in which only their close friends and family members are invited. I, for the one, agree with the latter one and will aptly substantiate my viewpoint in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, in small parties you can better socialize with people. When one invites a lot of people to a party, they can barely spend time with their guests; because after all they are the host and have to do a lot preprations during the party. However, when a person only invites a few close friends or family members to a party, he/she can spend more quality time with them. Furthermore, because the guests are close, he/she can be more comfortable and even ask them for help. For example, when I was invited to my cousin's wedding, because lots of people were there, I even had not the chance to say hello properly. Thus, holding smaller parties can provide you more time to spend with the guests.
Secondly, it goes without saying that it is easier to find shared interest between a few close friends than a lot of not-so-familiar people. When people gather together, they want to do some entertainment activities with each other. Therefore, if the guests are close friends and family, they can better agree on a hobby to do. For instance, me and my friends are weekly assemble and talk about our last week. Also, we also have the tendency to watch movie together and because we are close and have similar personalities, we like the same kind of movies. Hence, holding parties with your friends, you can spend a quality time with them doing some activities that all are interested in.
To sum up, I strongly believe that it is better to hold smaller parties in which only your close friends or family members are present. This is because you can better socialize with them, and because you have more things with them in common.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-12 | Taniazehra | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell-phone, online games, and social networking Web site. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All school teachers should be required to take courses every five years to update their knowledge. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to hold a big party and invite many people to come than a small party where only a few close friends and family members are invited. 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, after all, for example, for instance, kind of, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66321243523 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33899233099 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484455958549 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 560.7 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6803289303 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7368421053 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3157894737 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21052631579 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390815783179 0.236089414692 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127941070054 0.076458572812 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10827037301 0.0737576698707 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265827763726 0.150856017488 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496923342436 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.