TPO INTEGRATED 33
Recently some controversy has been generated about whether the lines surrounded the skeletal bones of the sykocypotros are feathers or not. The lectures contends that the lines are feathers. On the other hand, the reading refutes saying that the lines are not feathers.
The first point of dispute is if the skin decompose into fibers or not. The lecture claims that all the other animals in the area decomposition were well preserved. The fact that the synoprys feather were well preserved as well. However the reading states that the skins decomposed into fibers, then preserved into lines.
Another controversial issue is if the extra parts of the dinosaurs are feathers or frills. The lecturer says that the chemicals of the frills are totally different from that of the feather the feather contain beta carotene however the frills not. The fact that the synopricts fossils contain the same beta carotene confirm that the lines are feathers not frills. However the reading argues that parts of dinosaur anatomy are frills rather than feathers.
The final point of dispute is if the feathers have any purpose or not. the lecture contents that the colorful feather of the syropex were used to attract male during mate. The fact that they feathers were orange and white proof that they were used for that purpose. But, the reading refutes saying that the feathers were useless. The usual use of the feather were flight and thermoregulation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-15 | Salu | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-08 | maya14 | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lucasantunes | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | fateme ozggoli | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-05 | ilda | 85 | view |
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. 70
- Some students learn better by reading. Others learn more from listening to a teacher. Which way of learning is better for you, and why? Include details and examples to support your explanation. 73
- TPO INTEGRATED 22 73
- TPO INTEGRATED 49 65
- Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently some controversy has been gener...
^^
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'contend'.
Suggestion: contend
...otros are feathers or not. The lectures contends that the lines are feathers. On the oth...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ying that the lines are not feathers. The first point of dispute is if the ski...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ys feather were well preserved as well. However the reading states that the skins decom...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng states that the skins decomposed into fibers, then preserved into lines. ...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o fibers, then preserved into lines. Another controversial issue is if the ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 180, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'the feather'.
Suggestion: the feather
...ills are totally different from that of the feather the feather contain beta carotene however the frill...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 366, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...that the lines are feathers not frills. However the reading argues that parts of dinos...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nes are feathers not frills. However the reading argues that parts of dinosaur an...
^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tomy are frills rather than feathers. The final point of dispute is if the fea...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 75, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...f the feathers have any purpose or not. the lecture contents that the colorful feat...
^^^
Line 12, column 195, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'feather'
Suggestion: feather
...ct male during mate. The fact that they feathers were orange and white proof that they w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eather were flight and thermoregulation.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01195219124 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48921420575 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470119521912 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 373.5 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1079295364 49.2860985944 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.625 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6875 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 7.06452816374 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 4.19205298013 310% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0930854663257 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366529651981 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426076293206 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0565487032232 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505946050954 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.