The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
As a matter of fact, I don’t concur with this statement because if the society the individuals live in is a one with higher standards of human development, the greatness of an outstanding person is automatically recognized throughout his or her existence. In a developed society significant attempts made into placing value to mankind’s achievements; thus, they do not try to postpone the acknowledgement of their acclaimed figures until they pass away.
In contemporary time there are many incidents that illustrate how in a particular community accomplishments of distinguished people are respected. Sir Alex Ferguson, a successful manager of the Manchester City football club, could be an obvious example to see how in the UK the club pay homage to his endeavors throughout his professional career in the club for 26 years by erecting his statue in front of the team’ stadium to signify that his work for the club has been remarkably understood. Such actions may serve as a model for the other portions in a society in different forms as it helps the community to realize that no remarkable perseverance would be ignored.
On contrary, in undeveloped society we, unfortunately, observe how many leading people have been unable to make further progressions due to numerous barriers so that they never recognized during their lives but after they left this worldly universe. One of the Kurdish brilliant writer and poem named Sharafkandy with the nickname Hazhar, means poor, was never acknowledged during his career; he had to spend most of his valuable life career looking for sustenance. If his greatness was identified by his society and aided, then he could produce more books and products for his prospect generations.
In conclusion, the distinguishing of greatness of prominent figures has nothing to do with the time they live in or the time after their deaths; however, it is the issue of to what degree a particular society is developed in terms of humanitarian determinants. If a society place high value upon its distinguished individuals then the value of them recognized during their existence and be highlighted after their deaths, while in undeveloped communities the story is vice versa.
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, at 75
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work 70
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette."On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involv 83
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company."Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy. At the same time, manufacturers are now marketing many home appli 70
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise Currently the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away thus 80
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 35.9 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 359 350
No. of Characters: 1817 1500
No. of Different Words: 207 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.353 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.061 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.079 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 123 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 103 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 75 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 61 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 35.9 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.449 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.7 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.377 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.646 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.143 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5