Genetically modified trees
The passage and lecture both discuss the genetically modified trees which seems to be a controversial issue. The passage claims that genetically modified trees are full of environmental, economic and agricultural benefits. The lecturer, on the other hand, does not agree with the ideas brought up by the passage's author and offers some counterclaims to refute them.
First, both the passage's author and lecturer argue about the issue of genetically modified trees resistance to adverse conditions. The reading claims that genetically modified trees are more resistant species, which can tolerate severe environmental conditions. On the contrary, the lecturer supports an opposite view as compared to the that presented in the passage. The professor declares that although genetically modified trees are more likely to survive in such particular harsh conditions, but those trees are not able to tolerate most of the severe environmental conditions, which usually cause abrupt wiping out of the whole forest which includes just genetically modified trees.
Moreover, to respond to the assertion that the genetically modified trees are such cost effective trees, the professor claims that genetically modified trees have substantial hidden costs such as obligatory paying to the company which has done the implementation of the genetically modified trees planting for your farm every time you plant new seeds.
Finally, the lecturer contradicts the fallacy of the passage that planting genetically modified trees prevent overexploitation by satisfy the rising demand for wood and timber, saying that genetically modified trees damage natural trees in the area by hogging most of the soil nutrients and water, and this will damage natural trees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...al, economic and agricultural benefits. The lecturer, on the other hand, does not a...
^^^
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'passages'' or 'passage's'?
Suggestion: passages'; passage's
...aims to refute them. First, both the passages author and lecturer argue about the iss...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, moreover, so, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64393939394 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91795524467 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526515151515 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.293851958 49.2860985944 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 165.555555556 110.228320801 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 21.698381199 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.65162526972 0.272083759551 239% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.318773778404 0.0996497079465 320% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177964744206 0.0662205650399 269% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.452046095508 0.162205337803 279% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544791503748 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.3589403974 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 53.8541721854 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.0289183223 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.2367328918 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.