tpo18
Both the reading and lecturer are about Torreya taxifohna which is a kind of tree. The mentioned tree started to reduce and die out from 1950s. The reading provides three solutions for solving this problem and then supports them. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and finds all of arguments unconvincing also she says that these approaches will not have satisfactory results.
First of all, the author of reading declares that researchers should replant Torreya taxifohna in its original location. This native location is a particular and small microclimate in the northern Florida where Torreya taxifohna could be prosperous for many centuries. Since the aforementioned microclimate is cool and wet in compared with its around; hence, this tree may succeed. This point is challenged by the professor and she points out that microclimates are usually affected by their surrounding ambient and since global warming has occurred in all over the world; therefore, the wetlands and other large regions in the northern part of Florida have been dried up, so the microclimate will not be cool any more.
Secondly, the article contends that if scientists relocate Torreya taxifohna to another area such as a forest far away from northern Florida, this species would survive and reproduce. This transferring is called assisted migration; conversely, the lecturer expresses an experience with this approach to refute the mentioned idea by reading. Researchers could transfer another tree species which was called black locus tree to another area. Unfortunately, the mentioned species spread quickly and aggressively and killed a lot of other native species; as a result, one should not forget that assisted migration may have unprotected consequences.
Finally, the reading passage states that we should build a laboratory ambient for protecting of Torreya taxifohna. In this way, researches will also be able to do more researches on Torreya taxifohna and its deduction. This argument is rebutted by the lecturer and she poses that if Torreya taxifohna's population is not big enough, they will not be able to resist in front of diseases and meanwhile there is not enough space for maintaining large number of Torreya taxifohna.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-12 | khatuntajkera | 80 | view |
| 2020-07-26 | Nasirti | 70 | view |
| 2020-03-01 | bahar_93 | 70 | view |
| 2020-02-12 | sarkar | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | supergirl20 | 70 | view |
- should people be far away from lovely relationships for a long time or not. 88
- do you agree or disagree? the ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make new friends easily. 85
- do you agree or disagree?advertising can tell you a lot about a country. 80
- the state should set fines or penalties for companies which produce pollution or it should find other ways to deal with the pollution problem. which one is better? 90
- Tpo19 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ng this problem and then supports them. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 7, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... if Torreya taxifohnas population is not big enough, they will not be able to res...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, kind of, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1373.03311258 138% => OK
No of words: 356.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33707865169 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83756809662 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 145.348785872 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550561797753 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 419.366225166 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.3385044855 49.2860985944 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.666666667 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35963700486 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125578838615 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802425118472 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214700931081 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546078997425 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 63.6247240618 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.