Summarize the points made in the lecture. Being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The lecture and the reading are both about the use of Ethanol, which is fabricated by the use of some plants, as a replacement fuel rather than gasoline. The author of the reading believes that many critics are against the replacement of Ethanol for gasoline. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He thinks that actually the Ethanol is good alternative for gasoline and the provided reasons are not convincing at all.
First of all, the article points out that the Ethanol can not solve the global warming problem. It is mentioned that like gasoline, Ethanol produces carbon dioxide which traps the heat in the atmosphere, causes global warming. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says Ethanol do not add to global warming. Furthermore He argues that as the article mentiones, Ethanol is made with plants, and the process of growing plants, contradicrs to global warming.
Secondly, the author of the article contends that the use of Ethanol, reduces the amount of plants which are meant to be consumed by animals. The article notes that much of corn grow now in US is used to feed farm animals and when it should be produced to serve as a fuel, a significant source of food for animals would disappear. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggest Ethanol is produced using Cellulose. He adds most of Cellulose in parts of a plant is not eaten by animals, hence there would be no reduction of plants.
Finally, The author states that Ethanol can not compete with the gasoline on price. The article establishes that although the price of these two substances are rather equal now, but the government is paying subsidies to the ethanol producers to keep the price low. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that Ethanol can compete with the gasoline on price in the future. He puts forth to the idea that this governmental support would not be needed in the future because of the consequent increased production of ethanol. He says that generally increasing in the production, leads to the reduction of prices.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | Opak Pulup | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 73
- endangered species 60
- Summarize the points made in the lecture. Being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he replacement of Ethanol for gasoline. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...s Ethanol do not add to global warming. Furthermore He argues that as the article mentiones...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
.... The lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggest Ethanol is produced using Cellulose. He...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 556, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hanol. He says that generally increasing in the production, leads to the reductio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 30.3222958057 165% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 351.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8603988604 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56965211414 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498575498575 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 419.366225166 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7928008471 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7894736842 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4736842105 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.087763078929 0.272083759551 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352196703942 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562951782343 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0567670465635 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340441189118 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.