should people be far away from lovely relationships for a long time or not.
The question is whether for a long time, a person should be far away from people who are important in his life to obtain a deep insight about his relationship with them or not. Everyone with regard to his private view point may maintain a specific direction toward this statement. Some believe that being far would harm any relationship and create a cold atmosphere while others have a conviction that spending much time without people who we care about them, will provide constructive consequences such as better perceiving of relationship and knowing its troubles. I am unanimous with the latter group; so the next paragraphs will vastly elucidate my vantage point through three salient reasons:
To begin with, nobody could overlook this fact that nowadays, communities are struggling plentiful of social or economic crises; hence, in such a frustrating condition, people need to make new sentimental relationships with others. Yet, sometimes human beings may sink in their connections and not to recognize that their presence is vital for their partner or not. Even more, too being close in a relationship will cause living beings not to discern that their relation is based on love or dependence. Living beyond of a connection for a while, will give an opportunity people to perceive the real status in the mentioned friendship.
In addition, when two persons live together, their problems are not usually solved because those persons attempt to hidden them instead of finding an appropriate solution. The main sake for the aforementioned circumstance is that two sides behave in an emotional way, for instance, when a problem occurs, one side starts crying and another side may be affected by her tears. In a far situation from each other, people have a chance to watch their relation from outside; therefore, their evaluation power will be improved and as results, they would make the best decisions logically.
Moreover, if two sides really care about each other in a sentimental connection, any obstacle is not able to damage their affection; conversely, in such a great position, humans have enough time to know and overcome their wrong behavior; consequently, their personality and quality of relationship will be optimized.
To sum up, this conclusion could be drawn that spending much time far away lovely relationships assists people to see other angles of their relation and make effort to improve its problems in a logical route.
- do you agree or disagree? famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy that they have now . 90
- do you agree or disagree? the bosses have to pay their employees to get a university degree. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 76
- Do you agree or disagree?in 20 years from now on, students will not use printed books any more . 73
- do you agree or disagree?teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an emotional way" with adverb for "emotional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...d circumstance is that two sides behave in an emotional way, for instance, when a problem occurs, o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, hence, if, look, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, such as, to begin with, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2062.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18090452261 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83050209817 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592964824121 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.1344086022 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.5157242113 48.9658058833 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.833333333 100.406767564 171% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1666666667 20.6045352989 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6666666667 5.45110844103 251% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358508745501 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131323599565 0.076458572812 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12258323015 0.0737576698707 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191511973202 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084274249161 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 11.7677419355 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.1575268817 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.0537634409 151% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.