High school teachers (teachers of students ages 14-18) spend most of class time lecturing (speaking) while the students listen and take notes. Other high school teachers spend most of class time on discussion and projects that students are highly involved in and exchange their ideas. Which of these two approaches do you think is more effective for student learning and why？
Students all over the world are the paramount wellspring of new ideas and ingenious techniques. Schools play an important role in upbringing and growing these recourses as best as possible. Teachers, as well as the way they use to teach, are the core of this effort, In this regard. Some people think that teachers will spend most of the class time lecturing while students take notes and listen, others think otherwise. I, personally, subscribe to the idea in which students should have the right to discuss and participate in teaching in addition to their teachers. Reasons to support this idea are manifold, two of which are stated in detail hereunder.
To begin with, the chief reason for approving the latter idea is that this action tends to prepare students to act better in their futures. Consider students who are taught by teachers who give them the right to discuss and exchange their idea as "Active students." Active students, indeed, will be taught both their lessons and social activities. Active students tend to become more logical, for when they can talk about their ideas, they will understand that there are other ideas which might not exactly be the same as theirs. Therefore, they not only can learn how to defend their ideas, but they also can learn how to respect other ideas as well. In fact, they are gradually being taught for some positive behaviors which weigh more than learning a school lesson only. The other teachers, on the other hand, is alleged to have nothing for students but learning them a task which they can even study at their houses or in some cases, listening to a teacher's tape maybe suffice.
Moreover, active students are more likely to learn their lessons precisely. This is, because when they argue together, they may become curious to search whether other ideas are really better than theirs or not. In this circumstance, they seem to do not lean only on their books. Rather, they will value other books for a deeper search, so, concepts will better stick in their mind. Furthermore, they will be taught how a concept or a problem can have other aspects as well and this can have an impact on their way of learning. For instance, some students may use some codes to remember other aspects of a context, however, they can code it by remembering who has said what aspect. In contrast, the worst disadvantage of the former way of teaching is that in a hard situation, when students become ill during their exams, for example, they cannot study, and as a result, they will give a lower grade and probably lose the A. In the active student cases, however, inasmuch as teachers know the real knowledge of each student, hard situations are more likely to be tackled.
To sum up, with all taken into account, I do believe that teachers who let students discuss in the classes are better for students as far as preparing students to have a better future and making a situation in which learning will be more effective is concerned.
- Imagine that you are a student at a university where there are long breaks between semesters. The university requires all students to do one of the following for one month during the break.a. Students must take a course which has no direct connection to t 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The more money people have, the more they should contribute to charity. 91
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. 73
- Increasingly, robots and computers are being used to do work that humans once had to do for themselves. Some people believe the effect of this change will be mostly positive and helpful for humans. Other people believe that robots and computers will take 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most people can solve important problems in their lives by themselves or with the help of their families. Help from the government is unnecessary. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ible. Teachers, as well as the way they use to teach, are the core of this effort, ...
^^^
Line 1, column 657, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f which are stated in detail hereunder. To begin with, the chief reason for appr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 962, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a teacher' or simply 'teachers'?
Suggestion: a teacher; teachers
...r houses or in some cases, listening to a teachers tape maybe suffice. Moreover, active...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in contrast, in fact, as a result, as well as, in some cases, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2479.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 516.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80426356589 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43734278167 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484496124031 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 746.1 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7775892108 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.047619048 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0952380952 5.45110844103 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195468256023 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704415289241 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875573841188 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156707166879 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603950363482 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.