The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
The statement contends that compared to machines made by the efforts of human minds, the human mind will always be superior. Having said that we live in the 21st century, it is the age of technology advancement and the innovations through that technological development. With the evolution of science, now human minds have made so many machines that work according to human need. Be it robots that do the job of a security guard or be it any machine that keeps your valuable things safe and makes a sound when somebody tries to touch it or steal it without permission, we have seen so many inventions that were once mere dreams. Therefore, a question arises here is whether these machines are superior to the human mind or not and according to me despite the innovations, we have done till now and innovations that have to be made, the human mind will always be one step ahead of machines.
The chief reason of my agreement lies in the fact that it is the human minds only that create and develop these machines. Having said that we are the creators, we have total control on machines and these machines are just the slave of humans. Therefore, we can never assert that they are more superior to us. We can switch on these machines whenever we want and we can switch off too whenever we want and therefore humans have the ultimate remote in their hands to control the machines and machines do not control us.
Secondly, human mind may develop with time because of the way it strives and it gets more experience and these all factors lead to the advanced technology that is the reason for generating new machines. But when it comes to the machine, we do not see any growth in it by itself, machines do not have the capability to grow themselves on their own. Therefore the development of a machine is only possible when developed human mind applies to it. Therefore it shows the superiority human mind possesses to the machines.
Finally, the most important thing that human mind has and a machine does not is natural sense. The human mind has the ability to respond according to the situation and can distinguish between the right and wrong. But this is not in the case of a machine as machine lacks the natural sense. A machine only works as per it is programmed or as per the instructions were given to it. This fact is very vital and sometimes generate the doubt on the credibility of machines.
However, there have been some cases where machines have created the threat of being superior to human minds. One such case is about the robots generated in the Facebook laboratory which recently started developing their own language and started working contrary to what they were instructed. But then again they were stopped immediately by the scientists of the laboratory which throws light on the superiority of human minds and states that ultimately it is the human mind that is one step ahead than machines.
In sum, I conclude that as human mind controls, develops and evolve the machines and machines work as per our instruction; the human mind is superior to machines and always will be.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | shoeb_athar | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | DH123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | arjun2112 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | ajay yadav | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | Nithin Narla | 50 | view |
- The origin of life was highly speculative until agraduate student at the University of Chicago, Stanley Miller designed and conducted an empirical research project under the guidance of his graduate advisor, Harold Urey. In this classic experiment, the re 3
- Tidal Power 73
- Do computers think? It isn't a new question. In fact, Alan Turing, a British mathematician, proposed an experiment to answer the question in 1950 and the test, known as the Turing test, is still used today. In the experiment a group of people are asked to 71
- Do you think that television programs, movies, and video games influence young people’s behavior?Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 76
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 29
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...bility to grow themselves on their own. Therefore the development of a machine is only po...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...hen developed human mind applies to it. Therefore it shows the superiority human mind pos...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 79, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: be
...t human mind has and a machine does not is natural sense. The human mind has the a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 65.0 33.0505617978 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2565.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 546.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6978021978 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83390555256 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54013721921 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.428571428571 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 827.1 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0276321308 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.590909091 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95454545455 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.536456794109 0.243740707755 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190281112476 0.0831039109588 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154806832993 0.0758088955206 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335694929299 0.150359130593 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122007938107 0.0667264976115 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.