The pie charts below describe average household expenditures by major categories in Japan and Malaysia in 2010.
The proportion of the median Japanese and Malaysian family’s expenses to various divisions in 2010 are collated in the pie charts.
Overall, the most prevalent disbursement of Japan for other goods and services whilst it’s of Malaysia for Housing. On the contrary, Healthcare obtained by far the lowest percentage of expenditure in both countries.
Looking at the information in more detail, the greatest proportion of paying out (34%) was on Housing in Malaysia meanwhile in Japan Housing accounted for just 21% of the total. Likewise, in Japan, the biggest single outlay was other goods and services at 29%, compared with 26% in Malaysia. Furthermore, Food came in second place in both Japan and Malaysia, at 24% and 27%, respectively. There was a double-spending for Transport between Japan (20%) and Malaysia (10%). Eventually, Japanese people are more attentive Healthcare than Malaysian, just only 3% paid by Malaysian whereas 6% paid by Japanese.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-01 | mifas meleraroth | 56 | view |
| 2017-11-12 | ittovo92 | 61 | view |
| 2017-06-12 | thupham1909 | 67 | view |
| 2017-06-12 | thupham1909 | 73 | view |
| 2017-06-12 | thupham1909 | 56 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011. The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one-person households.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 78
- Burnaby Public Library 78
- The pie charts below describe average household expenditures by major categories in Japan and Malaysia in 2010. 61
- Discussion the reason why people define happiness differently and how to obtain happiness 57
- The crime rate among teenagers has increased dramatically in many countries. Discuss some possible reasons for this increase and suggest solutions. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, likewise, look, second, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37086092715 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04213643625 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629139072848 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0980426365 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.375 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160306028932 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697565105828 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301963510344 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101191988468 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130558693924 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.