Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who have learned many different skills are more likely to succeed than those who focus on learning only one skill.
In such a civilized society, in spite of several disagreements, people have in various areas so far as one’s view goes, one point that virtually everybody approves upon is the importance of success. This is owing to the fact that it is the human’s natural desire to become a successful person in the society. With this in mind, a broad range of controversial attitudes might stimulate heated debate as to what is the best way to reach that. Two sides often form in this regard. Those who trust that knowing numerous skills is better, while others who think having only one skill is superior to the other choice. I personally consider myself among the first group. Among the many reasons one can give for this point, two conspicuous reasons will be elaborated through ensuing lines.
The first and prominent reason comes to the mind is that those who learn more than one task are more productive. It goes without saying that learning various skills, gives a significant opportunity to individuals to become more creative and thus this creativity provide a good atmosphere to become more productive. On the other hand, concentrating on only one skill, not only is more tedious but also is an obstacle to being productive. Take an example of a worker in a company who knows numerous skills. He is able to work in different parts of that company and as a result, is more productive and is considered as a high-respected worker in that company which this productivity leads him to a fast progress and becoming a successful person in his life.
Another equally imperative reason which deserves some words here is that finding a career is more convenient for those have the ability to accomplish in various skills. Needless to say that there are some jobs which are saturated in each society. In this situation, those who are an expert on the only same saturated career, they have some trouble in finding another job owing to the lack of skill. But, those who know other tasks can get a job very easily. Take myself as an example, when I was graduated from the University, I wanted to find a job related to my field, which was mining engineering. Sadly, I could not find that due to a copious graduated students in this field in my country. Since I had the ability of painting, I enrolled as a pioneer in National art school and changed the route of my life and became an academic lecturer after just a short period of time.
In conclusion, there are numerous reasons which can be persuasive enough to substantiate my view. Based on the given reasons above, which are being productive and getting a job more easily, it can be inferred that those know numerous skills are more successful than those who concentrate on one task.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-25 | Amiren | 87 | view |
| 2020-08-30 | bL3sse | 60 | view |
| 2020-11-15 | minafathi75 | 76 | view |
| 2020-12-07 | simonmohammad | 83 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people should try several different jobs before they take a long term career. 90
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 80
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 80
- TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him 80
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'student'?
Suggestion: student
...ot find that due to a copious graduated students in this field in my country. Since I ha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 864, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...an academic lecturer after just a short period of time. In conclusion, there are numerous ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 880, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urer after just a short period of time. In conclusion, there are numerous reason...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, thus, while, as to, in conclusion, as a result, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.0286738351 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2259.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74579831933 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67577049139 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512605042017 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 735.3 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.576018907 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.571428571 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95238095238 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257434388425 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739851024457 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882779533699 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159499299322 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442802169249 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.