The flow chart illustrates the consequence of deforestations.
The flow chart shows what typically occurs as a consequence of deforestation.
In general terms, when forests are cut clearly, there are four main immediate effects, which eventually results in flooding, degraded vegetation and a loss of biodiversity.
One immediate effect is soil which has been compressed by heavy logging equiment. As a results, soil becomes hard and baked which contributed to run off of rain water and eventually flooding. Another consquence of logging is a reduction in the number of roots holding the soil in place. This lead to soil erosions. As a consequence, the quality and variety of vegetation is degraded.
The third effects is burning, both deliberate and accidental are increased risk of forest fires. The waste wood that logging is destroyed and the microorganisms that feed on this materal are lost. This is also leads to degraded vegetation. The final consequence is a reduction in the amount of moisure plants return to the air. This leads to less precipitation and an increased drought. As a results, this too reduces plant growth in degraded and a loss of biodiversity.
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 71
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion. 56
- the bar chart below shows the types of music bought in USA in 2010 by age group 88
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 67
- The graph shows the percentage of adolescents following a vegerarian diet. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...ompressed by heavy logging equiment. As a results, soil becomes hard and baked which cont...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 390, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...cipitation and an increased drought. As a results, this too reduces plant growth in degra...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, third, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10989010989 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03905266193 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7990931568 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.5384615385 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0774968357184 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310886103466 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857408271589 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865332555267 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133648429645 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.