Integrated writing – TPO24
The professor provides 3 reasons which contradict with the hypothesis presented in the writing based on revealed materials in T. rex bones that seem to be remains of blood vessels, red blood cells, and collagen matrix.
First, he stated that existing branching channel inside the leg bone cannot indicate the presence of blood vessels, however, it can be due to something else like bacteria whose activity causes creating hollow channels and they remain organic soft materials inside the bone.
Second, His idea is cast doubt with the reading state of the presence of red blood cells because of existing spheres like red blood cells inside inner parts of the bone. He believes that this cannot be red blood cell and the presence of iron could be from another event origin that would reddish during the time.
Finally, his statement is contradicting with the last hypothesis of the writing and he said that collagen cannot endure about 70 million years inside the leg bone of T. rex. He argues that it is impossible this happen and he states that origin of this collagen is likely from the skin of researcher who handling the bone.
Therefore, all reasons of the writer about the remaining of the actual tissues inside the bones of the T. rex rejected by the professor statements.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Integrated writing of TPO 26 75
- Independent writing TPO26Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. Use specific reasons 73
- Integrated writing TPO 25 81
- Integrated writing TPO40 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...x rejected by the professor statements.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, second, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 218.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89908256881 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38237291342 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54128440367 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6790789093 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429664378968 0.272083759551 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186244929244 0.0996497079465 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122739843381 0.0662205650399 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248743466208 0.162205337803 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833267791937 0.0443174109184 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.