The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia.
The first chart illustrates the number of males and females have been watching reality shows. The second bar chart depicts the percentage of television programme (game) watched by both genders.
Overall, in both charts, in Australia, the greatest number of TV programmes being interested by over 45 years old people Whereas, 16 to 24 years youth have identically same interest. In the initial bar chart, females percentage have been significantly more than in latter chart having equal percentage to males. From 16 to 45+ years both genders having increase by reality shows. Whilst, game shows popularity gradually declined Although, there have been some fluctuations in both charts.
It can be seen that, in the first chart, nearly 70% of women are being watched reality shows which is approximately 35% more than men (considerably less than 40%). Moreover, most age groups (16-24, 25-34, 35-44 and 40+ aged respectively) have watching reality programmes increasingly ( just over 50%, 60%, marginally less than 70% and just below 70% respectively).
Whilst, in latter bar chart, the same age groups except 16-24 youngsters and 45+aged, have shown less interest watching game shows ( under 40% and 70% respectively). It is interesting that, equal percentage of game shows being enjoyed by watching on TV by both genders ( around 60%). However, compared to initial bar chart females, 25-34 and 35-44 aged habitants percentage is dropped in game shows. In addition, males watching rate is increased, from considerably less than 40% in reality programmes to 60% game shows. Even though, 16-24 and 45+ age groups watching both genres of TV programmes by same percentage.
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007. 78
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 56
- The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia. 67
- some people believe that the internet is a wonderful tool for making new friends and maintaining existing friendships others however think that socialising online removes the face to face contact so vital to human relationships 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erall, in both charts, in Australia, the greatest number of TV programmes being i...
^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...watching reality programmes increasingly just over 50%, 60%, marginally less than...
^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... shown less interest watching game shows under 40% and 70% respectively. It is in...
^^
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...njoyed by watching on TV by both genders around 60%. However, compared to initial...
^^
Line 7, column 350, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'habitants'' or 'habitant's'?
Suggestion: habitants'; habitant's
...bar chart females, 25-34 and 35-44 aged habitants percentage is dropped in game shows. In...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29166666667 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7393016502 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496212121212 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 390.6 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9341329601 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.461538462 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206170418667 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088562839812 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611543121439 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140340787405 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490728035872 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.