The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The presented line graph illustrates the amount of fish, beef, lamb and chicken eaten by European people from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, while the consumption of fish was quite steady, those of the others had a significant fluctuation over this period.
Turning to the detail, a small decline in the amount of fish consumed has been detected in the first 5 years, starting from about 60 grams per person per week in 1979 to about 50 grams per person per week in 1984. The figure experienced 15 years of stability before decreased a little in 1999, then remained constant by the year 2004.
By contrast, from the high starting points in 1979, the consumption of beef and lamb spent many years oscillating. However, in general, both of them had a downward trend up to 2004, unlike chicken, the consumption of which significantly increase from the starting point of below 150 grams per person per week to approximately 250 grams per person per week in 2004.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2017-12-30 phuong cao 73 view
2017-12-30 phuong cao 73 view
2017-12-30 phuong cao 67 view
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user phuong cao :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The presented line graph illustrates the...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by European people from 1979 to 2004. Overall, while the consumption of fish w...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nificant fluctuation over this period. Turning to the detail, a small decline i...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en remained constant by the year 2004. By contrast, from the high starting poin...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61558513207 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3273434136 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111195950175 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647800428792 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422792559594 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821299610032 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436525781062 0.0819641961636 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.