In many countries children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong. Others consider it as a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion?
Nowadays, the question “ whether emplying children at an early age is a reasonable decision or not?” has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world. It is a widely held view that working in a certain age is highly beneficial, whereas one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that employing children in several kinds of paid works plays a vital role in each society. To put into consideration, I express why I do not support this idea. First and foremost is that the majority of children are forced to undertake some responsibilities, such as washing dishes, cleaning floors, and serving foods in restaurants that do not bring them any valid knowledge. Secondly, it can be argued that they have to work in a demanding circumstances. For example in factories with low level of income rather than adaults. Therefore, it can be a kind explotation. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that their lessons might be neglected and subsequently they will be failed in their examinations. A group of socialists, working at prestigious university conducted that such children are more likely vulnerable and are exposed on unsafe and hazardous works.
However, there is no doubt that employing children provides people with various positive points. It should be taken into account that they think working at an early age gives children a sence of independency and self-confidence to undertake prominent responsibilitie. Moreover, they will be able to achive a wide variety of valuable experience that are excessively efficient in the future.
To recapitulate, I entirely disagree with employing children at an early age so that some useful actions must be taken into account to addres this problem. However, as every gardem may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and the individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that? 80
- There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day life. What are the benefits and detrimental effects of it? 88
- Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views. 96
- "The illiterates of the 21st century are not those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn"- Alvin Toffler. Explain the statement and do you agree or disagree. 79
- Environmental pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nable decision or not?' has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'circumstance'?
Suggestion: circumstance
...d that they have to work in a demanding circumstances. For example in factories with low leve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are hoped to heighten their intellect.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in addition, in fact, no doubt, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17080745342 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0795758274 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596273291925 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6536969019 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159090226492 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534464164535 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293685896045 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908965437278 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030236188432 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.