Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is true that sharing information related with scientific research, business and academic world is good for everyone, according to some people. In my opinion, it is also important to think twice before sharing too important or too valuable information freely. This essay will discuss both of the views.
There are some benefits of sharing information. First of all, for the further development in the field of scientific research, business and academic world, it is necessary to share information so that more people can contribute. For the medical related development, for example, it is important to have more samples of diseases and opinions regarding the treatment of these. It is also necessary to ensure that this free flow of information is not misused by anyone, otherwise it can have bad effects on everyone.
The availability of some information can be very dangerous. The information regarding the making any sensitive objects like atomic bomb or nuclear bomb might create a lot problems. The evil people will take advantage of it by creating fear and destruction. This will be harmful not only for a country but also for human kind. Besides, the security information of a state should not be disclosed as it is too valuable. For this reason, it is not necessary to share every information freely.
In conclusion, although it is good to share information for the development of scientific research, business and academic world, sensitive information like the formula of making a bomb or state security information should not be shared freely. I believe that it is better to have some restrictions on the sharing of some information for the benefit of humankind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | Sheetal Bataniya | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | lipsa pipaliya | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | lipsa pipaliya | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | tamimadnan6240 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | kuldeep sharma | 93 | view |
- Many people complain about commercial advertisements and their influence on children. Should it be controlled by the government? What are the possible effects on children? 73
- Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on young children.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Nowadays the crime rate among young people is increasing. Why do you think this is happening? What can be done by parents and teachers to reduce it? 67
- Many people prefer to spend money and not save it What are the reasons Is this a positive or negative development 88
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. Discuss both these v 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 515, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se it can have bad effects on everyone. The availability of some information can...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...clear bomb might create a lot problems. The evil people will take advantage of it b...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, regarding, so, for example, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15328467153 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96644167763 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467153284672 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9614534879 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467008845994 0.244688304435 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164153634277 0.084324248473 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113605267133 0.0667982634062 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.330160173793 0.151304729494 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122216986633 0.056905535591 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.