The graph under show the percentage of student satisfaction of the staff in four colleges from 1991 to 2002
The line graph indicates the rating satisfaction of the staff in four colleges from 1992 to 2002
Overall, the rate satisfaction of the staff never got 100 percent. The rating was change , both of the college A and B had downward trends, while both of college B and D had upward trends
In 1991-1993, the rate of college A grew from over 60% to 70% and then it went down. In 1995-1996 the percentage declined from over 80% to under 70% and it continued to decline. 1997-2000, the rate rose but it was not much, from 2000 to 2002 the percentage fell by 20%. College D, in 1991-1997 the rate was change but almosst it remained unchanged. In 1998-2001, the rate went down. In 2002 the percentage fell by 20%
College B, 1992-1995 tha rate satisfaction of the staff fluctuated around 50%. 1996-1997 the rate jumped from 50% to 70%. In 1997-2002 the rate continued to rise. College C, 1991-1995 the percentage hover around over 30%, 1995-1998 the rate had a trough of 30% to 70% . In 1998-1999 the rate took off suddently by 60%, 1999-2002 the rate increasead steadily
- The graph under show the percentage of student satisfaction of the staff in four colleges from 1991 to 2002 61
- The diagram below shows how a solar powered water pump wwork Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 53
- The diagrams below show information about the number of UK university students and the government spending on each university studentSummaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...staff in four colleges from 1992 to 2002 Overall, the rate satisfaction of the st...
^^^
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r got 100 percent. The rating was change , both of the college A and B had downwar...
^^
Line 2, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oth of college B and D had upward trends In 1991-1993, the rate of college A grew...
^^^
Line 4, column 268, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...1998 the rate had a trough of 30% to 70% . In 1998-1999 the rate took off suddentl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60526315789 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62784547331 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505263157895 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.4280847895 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5454545455 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.45454545455 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306229052838 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128210908817 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960269124695 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239145728842 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124078087004 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.22 8.06136585366 77% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.