The graph below shows average carbon dioxide ( CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph give information about the amount of emissions average from carbon dioxide per person in the four countries from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, there was an increase in the number of emissions emitted in Italy and Portugal. Meanwhile, in United Kingdom and Sweden were a decrease in the amount of emissions emitted.
It is clear that. The emissions of car dioxide in United Kingdom make up at the highest one among all these four countries about 11 metric tonnes. After it is start declined steadily to 2007 and stoot at approximately 7 metric tonnes. In Sweden experienced a significant increase in emissions CO2 in 1967 and reached its peak at approximately 10.5 metric tonnes, after during the perio, the was a decreade in the number of emissions emitted about 5 metric tonnes in 2007.
In contrast, in 1967, in Italy the emissions of carbon dioxide approximately 4.2 metric tonnes and in 2007 the emissions make up at the highest the figure of emissions.in Portugal, the emissions accounted for the lowest number with only about 1 metric tonnes in 1967. However, in 2007 the amount of production of carbon dioxide increasing and reached it was peak at 5.2 metric tonnes.
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 92
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010 67
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide ( CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
- People s opinions differ as to whether or not the usage of computers for educational purpose should be encouraged at schools Computers are being used more and more in education Some people say that this is a positive trend while others argue that it is le 81
- The table shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91044776119 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7049216392 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462686567164 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.2035889291 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318976689474 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134903521503 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883955630898 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219656809058 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575468701472 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.