Map
The maps provide information regarding the changes of Hogward Grammar School between 2004 and 2010.
It is clear that there were more school buildings in 2010 due to the increase in the number of students. Besides, the area of the sport was smaller.
To be specific, in 2004, there was only one building, which was built in order to study. However, in 2010, two new school buildings were constructed in the north and the west of the sport field because the figure for student increases by 400. Additionally, there were more walking paths to connect three building in the school.
In contrast, the area of sports was narrow than 2004 but it still was bigger than each school building. Besides, a new carpark was built in the northwest, which was smaller than the old.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-18 | paula_ngy08 | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-14 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- Some people claim that not enough the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste. 61
- Some people believe that unpaid community services should be a compulsory part of high school programs. What extent do you agree? 56
- Some people said the government should not spend money on building theatres and sports stadiums Instead it should spend money on medical care and education Do you agree or disagree 42
- Eating fastfood 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, regarding, still, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 636.0 965.302439024 66% => OK
No of words: 134.0 196.424390244 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74626865672 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.40232815919 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39411545609 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597014925373 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 171.9 283.868780488 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6487347016 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0496326450864 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0274388688511 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725964232369 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0548777377022 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950510299046 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.