Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, decision making policy and its enormous impact has sparked a heated debate among the people all around the globe. Although many people contest that involving staff in decision-making system is highly beneficial, there are groups of individuals holding conflicting views. I firmly believe that the issue mentioned above can play a vital role in the success of every firm, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social point of view, significant factors could be taken into account why I promote deciding by employees. First and foremost is a competitive market correlated with productivity as well as creativity, which means that these agents are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I perused the British journal of psychology has published a report in which it claims that job loyalty and job satisfaction will play a vital role in this respect. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both career progression and team chemistry apparently can be seen.
In political terms, there is no doubt that involving personnel in decision making policy can cause another positive result as well. One persuasive argument is that it leads to employee engagement and highly motivated staff in addition to climbing the career ladder. For instance, scientific research undertaken by scholars of the prestigious university has indicated if had they have more accurate information in advance, they would have faced problems effectively. Hence, it causes styles of management, participation, and human resources.
To recapitulate, while there is compelling evidence on both sides, I entirely agree that the benefit of involving employees in company’s planning process outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantage of output proves the significance of having positive attitudes towards an organization but also pinpoint building trust.
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that? 88
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that? 11
- Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? (Discuss with appropriate examples.) 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, no doubt, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55862068966 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07743117546 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 139.433497537 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68275862069 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8233748903 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155690699679 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460054950329 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572543792097 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0835399747544 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470648253712 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.