task 1: Vietnamese student
The line graph compares the average number of Vietnamese student studying in three nations from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, it is clear from the line graph that the average number of Vietnamese student studying in American experienced the most dramatic change during the research period. At the same time, while the figure for America and France both increased, there was a slight decrease in the number of Russia.
In 2000, the average number of Vietnamese student studying in France began at about 3.5 million and then declined sharply to approximately in 2005. The figure for Russia was lower at 3 million, whereas the number for The US accounted for the lowest number at around 1.5 million in 2000. Despite some fluctuations, there was a sharp increase to 4.5 million in the figure for France in 2015.
In 2015, the average number of Vietnamese student studying in Russia declined sharply to about 2.5 million. However, the figure for America saw a sharp riseò and became the highest point of the whole line graph.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-28 | hoangquang | 61 | view |
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- task 1: the consumption of Beef, Lamb over the period of 25 years 61
- task 1: car ownership 78
- task 1 the consumption of four different food groups 89
- task 1: the consumption of Lamb, Chicken the period of 25 years 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97093023256 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4434311117 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494186046512 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.4783810132 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.875 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160041735068 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985898709671 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996196322282 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138182264407 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470678068807 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.