task 1: car ownership
The line graph compares information about car ownership in England between 1971 and 2007.
Overall, it is clear from the line graph that car ownership of three or more cars was by far lowest during the research period. At the same time, the number of no car and two cars experienced the most dramatic change.
In 1971, the number of no car began at about 48% and then decreased gradually to 30% in 1995. The figures for one car, two cars were lower at about 10%, around 8% respectively, whereas three or more cars accounted for the lowest number with only approximately 1% in 1971. Despite some fluctuations, the number of no car declined gradually through the period, ending at about 25% in 2007.
There was a slight decrease in the figure for one car to about 44% in 2007, compared with 27% of two cars. Meanwhile, three or more cars saw a sharp rise, reaching the final figure of 7% in 2007
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-29 | hoangquang | 78 | view |
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- task 1: the number of marriages 61
- task 1 the consumption of four different food groups 89
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping? Is this a positive or negative development? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 734.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50306748466 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42502851438 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576687116564 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 212.4 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5435522492 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.75 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289933585154 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152270055975 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684028432899 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207852429364 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074023003339 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.