task 1: the consumption of four different food groups
The line graph illustrates the consumption of four different food groups in a European nation from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, it is clear that while the consumption of Beef, Lamb, and Fish decreased, there was an upward trend in the amount of Chicken consumed over the 25-year period. Additionally, the figure for Fish was by far lowest during the research given.
In 1979, the expenditure on Beef began at over 200 grams per person per week and then decreased gradually to about 170 grams in next decade. The figure Lamb declined steadily from exactly 150 grams in 1979 to 100 grams in 1989 and then continued to fall to only above 50 at the end of the period. By contrast, the consumption of Chicken went up dramatically to almost 250 grams a person a week in 2004, which was the highest point of the whole line graph.
Although the spending on Beef fluctuated, it experienced a sharply decrease by 70 grams, ending at 100 grams in 2004. Meanwhile, the amount of Fish ate decreased slightly from approximately 60 grams to 50 grams per person each week in 2004.
- task 1 never married 84
- task 1: the amount of Beef, Lamb was eaten over the 25-year period 73
- Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects, while others claim that students should focus on the subject that they are best at or that they find interesting. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 61
- Environment protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping? Is this a positive or negative development? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('sharply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...ding on Beef fluctuated, it experienced a sharply decrease by 70 grams, ending at 100 grams in 200...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68617021277 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61357561611 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56914893617 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6786808754 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.125 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111787293948 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644221223595 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134218533318 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118867355731 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171545332186 0.0819641961636 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.