task 1: marriage and divorce
The first bar chart compares the number of marriage and divorces in America from 1970 and 2000. The second chart illustrates the marital status of adult Americans between 1970 and 2000.
Overall, it is clear from the two bar chart that the number of marriage was by far highest in 1970. Additionally, divorced accounted for the lowest percentage of adults.
In 1970, the number of marriage began at 2.5 million and then remained stable at exactly 2.5 million in 1980. At the same time in 1980, the figure for divorces accounted for the lowest number with only 1 million. Despite some fluctuations, the figure of marriage decreased sharply throughout the period, ending at 2 million in 2000.
There was only over 10% of the status of never married compared with 70% of married in 1970. The figure for widowed was lower at under 10% at the same time in 1970, whereas the figure for divorced made up the lowest number with only above 1% in 1970. In 2000, the status of never married stood at 20%. Additionally, the figure for married saw a sharp rise to 60%. however, there was a dramatic decline to about 7% in the widowed and saw only under 10% of the divorced.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-30 | hoangquang | 67 | view |
- task 1: marriage and divorce 67
- task 1: the consumption of Chicken, Fish over the period of 25 years 78
- Task 2:The consumption of the world’s resources such as oil or water is increasing at a dangerous rate. What are the causes and solutions 73
- task 1: member of parliament 78
- task 1: expenditure on income groups 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...re for married saw a sharp rise to 60%. however, there was a dramatic decline to about ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63285024155 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38140242394 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468599033816 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.865405264 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.9166666667 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139601888385 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627087018293 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661452575551 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115750487966 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526635450238 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.