The only thing that interferes with my leaning is my education- Einstein. What does he mean by that? And do you think he is correct?
The role of conventional ways of acquiring education is widely debated, with many academics claiming that traditional academic studies hinder oness spontaneous learning and so prove detrimental in the acquisition of education. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
The arguments in favour of academic education are myriad. The most conspicuous one is that not every learner possesses extraordinary talent as prodigies like Albert Einstein or William Shakespeare, who did not require a proper learning environment. Instead, they enhanced their knowledge spontaneously and did not require outside pressure or a stereotyped curriculum. However, this is something that is applicable to a handful of pupils. In general, in order to acquire knowledge successfully, learners need a step-by-step procedure which also varies according to their age. There is no doubt that without strict rule setting and stringent discipline, most students will not feel any pressure to study at all. Besides, frequent tests and exams are also essential to insure that students have learnt their lessons properly. Needless to say, all these merits will stand learners in good stead, as far as effective learning is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of traditional education is that the curriculum is set in such a way that by the time they finish their academic studies, students learn a variety of subjects. They gain knowledge in such fields as science, commerce, arts and literature. Apparently, learning a wide range of subjects will help youths in a variety of ways, from extending their horizons to instilling essential values in them to honing their skills in numerous fields. There is no denying that without a fixed guideline to follow; learners are bound to go astray, ruining their promising future.
From what has been discussed, one can conclude that formal education complements learning; the argument that claims conventional learning methods to be an interference with real learning is ungrounded indeed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-09 | edsonsimoes | 72 | view |
| 2019-05-27 | msgnaneswaran | 11 | view |
| 2019-05-06 | Deepika Naresh Rohra | 55 | view |
| 2018-09-05 | Hari Sharma | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-24 | SB83 | 77 | view |
- Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Agree or disagree 89
- Do you think formal written examinations are a good way to assess knowledge at school ? 11
- Information revolution has changed the ways of mass communication and has some negative and positive effects on individual’s life as well as on society To the what extent do you agree or disagree. 77
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this?Discuss with appropriate examples. 79
- Positive and negative points of the Packaged food 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 767, Rule ID: INSURE_THAT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ensure' (=make sure)? 'Insure' means 'pay money to insurance company'.
Suggestion: ensure
...t tests and exams are also essential to insure that students have learnt their lessons...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, however, so, still, in general, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 317.0 242.827586207 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45110410095 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95970006224 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 139.433497537 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615141955836 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4872894666 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.2 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 7.25397266985 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0564037812344 0.242375264174 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0180729905001 0.0925447433944 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0265712455785 0.071462118173 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0448481659174 0.151781067708 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321806452358 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.