Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
The university is an academic center the main responsibility of which is to prepare students for having both a successful profession and personal life. Indeed, experiences acquired at the university make students decide their path. Various points of view which are germane to the matter being discussed brings us to the moot question as to whether students should be obliged to take the history course at the university regardless of the field of study. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that study history is highly beneficial for students and they can take advantages of the critical role it plays during their education. The following paragraphs will aptly substantiate my personal stance.
To commence with, students are pillars of every given society and it is incumbent upon universities to provide an opportunity for students to broaden their horizon and become familiar with a wide variety of courses. Generally phrased, history is the symbol of culture and civilization and students should be needed to become acquainted with history in order to understand what the culture or a society is. As a tangible example, a visit to the museum could provide fertile ground for students to learn about the way of living of previous ancestors, failures, achievements and so forth. In this situation, not only can students appreciate the main purpose of history course but also can gain loads of information pertaining to ancient time. To elucidate more on this issue, if students avoid studying history, hardly can they make a conspicuous progress day in day out in their personal lives and we will soon witness a lagging society.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance in this subject is that our history is our best teacher. If we take a minute to ponder over it, vast majorities of people are not mature or experienced enough when it comes to decision making and often make an idiotic decision. So, the history can help and patronize us not to come up with erroneous tasks and do our works precisely and punctiliously. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that not only can history prevent us from an egregious mistake but also can teach us how to deal with future problems and difficulties.
However, this is the side effect of a coin. In fact, a university should encourage students to stay focus on courses that are more useful and helpful for them. For instance, students should be enticed to opt for courses, which are interested and they will certainly reach the pinnacle of their education. Indeed, concentrate on the course of history might be waste of time and money without any conclusion. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my point of view.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
- TPO 25 76
- Since its opening in Collegeville twenty years ago Monarch Books has developed a large customer base due to its reader friendly atmosphere and a wide selection of books on all subjects Last month Book and Bean a combination bookstore and coffee shop annou 49
- tpo 46 80
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 83
- Do you agree or disagree that progress is always good? 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 335, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...iscussed brings us to the moot question as to whether students should be obliged to take the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, as to, for instance, in fact, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2400.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 481.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9896049896 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78543143711 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532224532225 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 770.4 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4603295987 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.05 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293145774012 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814230417517 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670243115219 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142094943935 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928824255594 0.0645574589148 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.