The line graph below gives information about the rates of unemployment between 1991 and 2005 in three different countries in Europe. The table shows the percentage of men and women in the workforce in these three countries.
The given charts present change in unemployment rates in three countries, namely Spain, Germany and Italy. The charts also show a further information regarding proportion of employment rate by gender.
Regarding unemployment rates, Spain experienced a rise, increasingly from roughly 13% to 18% over two-year period, which still remained the latter number until 1996, The figure for people who lacking work gradually decline to approximately 9% in 2005. The majority group of both genders attributed to employment in 1991 was 66.2% of men.
Undergoing a similar downward trend, there was a growth in the number of unemployed people in Italy from 8% to 12% in 1999, followed by tailing of to the initial 8% and remaining the same figure through the end of the period. Italy indicated the same pattern of employment rate to that of Germany, about 77% of hired workers were men which had a much greater than the figure for women.
In conclusion, three nations have the same pattern of demographic statistic involving employment rate, men were the main worker.
Spain saw a dramatic decline lower than starting point. Conversely, Germany went through a period of fluctuation between 4% and 10%, before hitting a much larger proportion and made up the upward trend. Although Italy experienced a rise till 1999, the figure in the end of period had no change.
- The graphs below show the annual spending of a particular UK university from 1981 to 2001 33
- Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well. Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 75
- The line graph shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000, and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 89
- What are the advantages and disadvantages for children of watching television? Discuss both sides. 89
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, regarding, so, still, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11210762332 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73693996184 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600896860987 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7753293592 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158279599524 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632998220316 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532982239253 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921149037158 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572990228566 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.