The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The given line chart illustrates the consumption of some types of meat like chicken, beef, and Lamp as well as the fish’s consumption between 1979 and 2004 Europe union countries, Measured in grams per person for every week.
An overall trend, the most exciting feature is that the increasing of chicken’s consumption over The given period, while there is a decrease in the consumption of both lamp and beef between 1979 and 2004.
For chicken, there was rapidly an increase from approximately 140 grams in 1979 to around 200 Grams in 1989. During the next five years, there was fluctuation and stood at around 180 grams in 1994. Then rose significantly to about more than 250 grams in 2004.
The number of grams for eating beef noticed dramatically declining from around 230 grams in 1979 (which was approximately doubled the consumption of chicken) to around 120 grams in 2004.
Lastly, the consumption of lamb went down from 150 grams in 1979 to around 70 grams in 2004, whereas the consumption of fish witnessed steady dropping from 70 grams in 1979 to Approximately 40 grams in 2004.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choicesTo what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roadsTo what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 78
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, so, then, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93010752688 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77678153022 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537634408602 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6450968813 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193988203506 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102210832924 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750752662215 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134411902368 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636756759235 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.