The pie chart below shows the amount of money that a children’s charity
located in the USA spent and received in one year.
The graphs depict the percentage of income sources and spending money for children's charity in one year based in the USA.
Overall, it was immediately apparent that more money obtained from donated food. Moreover, USA spent large fund for program services.
Moving to more detailed analysis, in the USA, the donated food and community distribution had a greater contribution to the charity income, with 86,6% and 10,4% respectively. Where that the figure for donated food was the maximum recorded. By contrast, other income sources such as program revenue and other income showed a lower proportion, recording just under 3%. Furthermore, there was an identical pattern of government grant and investment income at 0,2%.
On the other hand, in the term of expenditure, more money was spent on program services accounted for 95,8%. However, on the fundraising, USA expended less money, which was noted just about 2,6%. Besides, at only 1,6% of the money was spent for management and general.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-30 | Bùi Lê Thảo Nhi | 78 | view |
- The table below shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondaryschool types between 2000 and 2009. 84
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and waterconsumption in two different countries. 67
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries China and India 50
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005 Plan B shows the same place in the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- The bar chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities Toronto Madrid Kuala Lumpur and Amman 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, however, moreover, so, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24528301887 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69421806184 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635220125786 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0882677765 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165442824698 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703966898824 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061827266343 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123133089861 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660174040867 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.