The graphs show changes in spending habits of people in the UK between 1971 and 2001
The pie charts provide the amount of expenditure on six items spent by people in the UK between 1971 and 2001.
Overall, it can be seen that the figures for cars, restaurants, and computers experienced an upward trend. Whereas that other category saw a reserved trend.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, in 2001, the expenditure on cars, restaurant, and computers witnessed an increase trend, while the cars inclined by more than a third from 22% to 12% respectively. By contrast, other items such as food, furniture, petrol, and books declined in 2001. Meanwhile, the former was decreased gradually, falling to 14 %, the three latters reduce to 8%, 8%, 1% each.
On the other hand, there was a greater proportion of cars, food, and restaurants expenditure in 2001, with 43%, 14%, and 14% consecutively, which the figure for cars was a maximum recorded. In addition, people in the UK spent a small proportion of books, with only 1 % in 2001, a much lower than other items.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The table below shows how many people in millions used different forms of public transport in Milan from 2010 to 2014 47
- Some people believe that a person’s intelligence is inherited from the parents,while others believe that their environment is the main factor. Discuss theseviews. Which factor do you think is mostly responsible for intelligence. 67
- The graphs show changes in spending habits of people in the UK between 1971 and 2001. 84
- The graph below depicts information about British Emigration to selecteddestinations between 2004 and 2007. 84
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... computers experienced an upward trend. Whereas that other category saw a reserved tren...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
third, whereas, while, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89156626506 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80760628672 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626506024096 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0505047794 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148899162989 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068084683594 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926820510275 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108720019916 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107588070543 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.