The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
Given is the table providing statistical information about the amount of people living in poor conditions in Australia in 1999. From an overall perspective it can be noted that, the average level of poverty was 11 % and approximately the half of it consisted of couples with children.
As will be observed, sole parents were ranked the first with 21% and were marginally ahead of sole person without children. Analyzing the chart more carefully, it reveals that couples without children were better off than the couples who had children.(12 % opposed to 7 %).
When it comes to older people, statistics portray that, compared to older couples, single ones were more likely living in better circumstances, to be more precise, 6 % of older person was marked as poor which conspired 54000 while older couples were 48000.(4 % ).
Overall, the chart suggests that, the poorest family types were sole parents.
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of Japanese tourist market. 63
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 77
- The table below gives information about population over 60 year old in six regions in 2000 and the predicted numbers of population over 60 in 2050 It also shows the world population over 60 in 2000 and 2050 83
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping. 75
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 70
flaws:
No. of Words: 146 200
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 146 200
No. of Characters: 723 1000
No. of Different Words: 89 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.476 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.952 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.536 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 54 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 40 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 21 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.141 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.475 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.819 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.085 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4