Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is said that knowledge should be shared widely to the public in the field of research, business and academy. The opposite side argues that sharing information openly might cause a deleterious impact on involved entities because of the information secret.
On the one hand, useful information is meant to be shared with everyone for the society’s benefit. Human being deserve to learn new things, discover emerging phenomenon and adapt it to our daily life. Results and innovative in laboratory should be transferred and applied to the public at large scale to benefit every single person in the world. In research and academy areas, updating knowledge from other researchers would help individuals save time on making mistake and doing research in a wrong path. Moreover, a research fellow can build the new research based on the literature review and avoid duplicating work. Useful knowledge of health could save many people and make their life better.
On the other hand, there is some secret information related to politics, deleterious sectors should not be freely published. In the case of business sector, sharing information is potentially harmful the company’s advantage. For example, a well-known restaurant is better to keep its secret recipes to guarantee its profit. In chemistry field, a research of drug or dangerous substance should be kept as for the right user.
In conclusion, despite the existence of some opinions in favour of this early decision, I do believe that most of the information can be shared for it to be the most valuable use.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | benj212 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Mouaz1994 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | wondertran | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Asma Shahin | 84 | view |
- ZoosSome critics contend that keeping animals in zoos is inhumane and must be changed. They believe that zoos are unnatural and provide no real benefit to society besides providing entertainment at the expense of the animals involved. The truth is that zo 75
- 4-Day WorkweekThe popular 5-day workweek has long been a staple in U.S. business. With employees working 8 hours a day for a total of 40 hours a week, it has been seen as a model of efficiency. However, some companies and government agencies have begun co 76
- Some people believe that crime is a result of social problems and poverty, others think that crime is a result of bad person's nature. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summa 93
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...arantee its profit. In chemistry field, a research of drug or dangerous substance should b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, well, as for, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21176470588 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84482708403 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7742377757 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.230769231 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271605662059 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091502452367 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648084755223 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176349227682 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356900971103 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.