Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings?
Nowadays, Increasing the population of cities encourages people to expand cities with destroying old places, and then the tall buildings are constructed in there are dwelling or shopping centers. A controversial question raises in this issue is destroying historic buildings are a right choice for another goal? Some people have this view that a city tries to maintain historic buildings to preserve the history of this place. On the contrary, some people have the opposite viewpoint that a city must destroy them and construct new buildings. I strongly subscribe the first notion and explain my reasons hereunder.
First and foremost, throughout the history of humankind, people strive to construct something to save themselves from a catastrophic weather with homes or buildings to have a decent life. After many years, these monuments and historic buildings reminded in some places have some messages about how past people showing their tradition about events such as feasts, marriage ceremonies, and thanksgiving. Maintaining these buildings leads to a future generation realizing their history and they will understand about their past culture. For example, in my town, one historic building remained from three thousand years ago, many archaeologists found in debris many paintings about my town people how supplied their needs from nature. Additionally, archaeologists perceived from painting the past people in my town were sophisticated in hunting. Preserving historic buildings can reveal some mystery about past people how they were living in there.
Secondly, growth in every town needs an economic plan to reach high prosperities. One of significant plan to absorb money for flourishing economic condition is attracting many tourists are going to places. With this regard, preserving historic places has the high potential of attracting traveler from around the world toward these places. Therefore, when coming in here to observe and spend their time with happiness, travelers also spend their money to buy something for supplying such needs as foods, clothes, and accommodation. The native people conveniently find the best consumer and sell their products them to get a lot of benefits. As economic standpoint in the Asian countries shows that the towns try to preserve their historic building, their people have a better income than the towns try to replace buildings.
All in all, in my opinion, people should try to maintain their historic building because not only shows their tradition behavior and culture, but also gives them an economic opportunity to earn much money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-15 | ashish150395 | 60 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | sena | 71 | view |
| 2019-05-27 | Hà Phúc Khang | 76 | view |
| 2019-05-15 | osfallatah89 | 70 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | ayush.rga | 70 | view |
- Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? 83
- Why do you think some people are attracted to dangerous sports or other dangerous activities? 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many ne friends easily. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many friends easily. 66
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2195.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44665012407 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80755387059 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535980148883 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7795698566 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.944444444 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3888888889 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280359398861 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909947356481 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709548605941 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187818202526 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853363243935 0.0645574589148 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.