Some Governments say how many children a family can have in their country should be strictly controlled. They may control the number of children someone has through taxes. Is It sometimes necessary and right for a government to control the population in this way?
Population explosion is the most pervasive concern around the globe. It is proposed that authorities can play a key role in controlling expanding population by imposing higher taxes to people violating the set limit of family members. I completely agree with this view, I believe that other than this method many other ways are ways also available to adopt such as limited resources, job, promotion, educational opportunities to large families. This essay shall discuss the role of government in controlling exceeding population rate.
Population left unchecked has been proven detrimental to all domains of life, this can be explained by concrete example of developing nation India. Unprecedented population has landed India in a deplorable situation in context of employment, education and environment. It has resulted in stagnant growth and deteriorating economy. Authorities can adopt a taxation model where taxes can be imposed to families with more than two children. Such model is currently working in republic of china, and after the adaptation of this model government of China was capable of putting halt to overgrowing population in their country. By executing this policy, authorities were capable of providing people with better educational and job opportunities, as a result of which china is now amongst the world powers.
Other than that, government can implement various rules such as limiting resources, promotional and incentive and educational opportunities to families whose members exceeded the set limit. An example of an execution of this policy is the country of Switzerland, where a family who has more than two children are not able to buy anymore farm land.
Albeit authorities can play vital role in keeping check on growing population, but it is the responsibly of inhabitants of a country too for a better living place for themselves and their precedents.
To sum up with, population of earth is growing at an alarming rate and authorities can play a pivotal role in controlling it. Various taxation schemes can be implemented ,and other modalities such as limiting resources and other opportunities, can also be can also be tried in controlling the expanding population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-13 | iamcrypticcoder | 67 | view |
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive 84
- In many countries, children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. 61
- As computers translate quickly and accurately learning foreign languages is a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- It is generally acknowledged that families are now not as close as they used to be Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together Include any relevant examples from your experience 44
- Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ious taxation schemes can be implemented ,and other modalities such as limiting re...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39481268012 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10598123004 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538904899135 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5844036848 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.8 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210206540823 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723274095261 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476054001769 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120463456933 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018406572656 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.