Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Solving environmental problems should be the responsibilities of one international organization instead of state or national governments
Nowadays, environmental problems have been becoming one of the utmost concerns across the globe such as climate change or global warming. There are some associations which are responsible for tackling with these problems. Some people hold the view that international organizations should undertake the possible solution to environmental problems rather than national governments. I agree with this idea for several reasons.
First of all, world organizations can figure out environmental problems by working collaboratively with other international governments. Moreover, they have more opportunity to invest money to placate these environment-related concerns in certain regions especially third world countries where are full of contaminations. Combining for this purpose can trigger some developments.
Another reason why I agree with this idea is that in some poor and undeveloped countries a vast majority of local people are not informed and educated enough to understand hazards, therefore, global organizations should hold informative orientations in order to raise awareness of people about undesirable harms of some potential problems.
On the other hand, it is argued by some people that each national government should be responsible for their regions because they better know their own problems and where these problems stem from, so national governments are able to fix them. In spite of these facts, such type of amendments in regions can negatively affect future precautions.
To sum up, although it is a common belief that local organizations should be responsible, personally, I am of the belief that international organizations bear a great responsibility to assist to solve problems
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-03-26 | Nail Kərimov | view |
- The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in Someland 81
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia. 89
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Solving environmental problems should be the responsibilities of one international organization instead of state or national governments
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, so, therefore, third, such as, first of all, in spite of, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75494071146 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36660528602 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592885375494 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.1716337531 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.363636364 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288269806554 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103094968884 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800041660468 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157580187804 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678963721803 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.