The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart demonstrates the data published in 2008 regarding to the United States’ energy usage from 1980, and its prediction until 2030. Overall, there were considerable increases in the amount of petrol & oil, coal and natural gas; while a relatively stable trend could be observed in the figure for nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower.
In 1980, the majority of favorable fuel consumed was petrol & oil at 35 quadrillion units, followed by coal and natural gas at 20 quadrillions and 16 quadrillions, respectively, lastly by the rest at merely 3 quadrillions. After then, the demand for petrol and oil fluctuated over the next 25 years and was estimated to reach over 45 quadrillions by 2030.
Moving to coal and natural gas, the figures for both of them climbed modestly to 22 quadrillion units in 2008 and were expected to grow to 25 by 2015. Then, the amount of coal is likely to rocket to 30 quadrillions by 2030. In contrast, the consumption of natural gas will remain unchanged. It is also interesting to note that the uses of nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower were stable and were predicted to keep their patterns, staying at approximately 5 quadrillions by 2030.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-01 | Rashila | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Sagar Gurung | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Mian | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | Tran Mai Phuong | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | AeronY | 56 | view |
- Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others contest those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit.What is your position? Discuss b 73
- A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- There is growing evidence that man-made activities are making global temperatures higher.What might be the man-made causes of temperatures rising? How should we deal with this problem? 61
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, lastly, regarding, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03553299492 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04913757786 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58883248731 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7611066506 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0696526845475 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.036788848229 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432602072579 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0533264379095 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293989835586 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.