Living in big cities is bad for people's health. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Some people hold the view that living in major cities, with the significant/exponential rise in urban population, is having negative impacts on resident’s health. I totally agree with this statement for the following reasons.
Nowadays, urban life poses many risks on city dwellers’ health and well-being. The first problem stems from the cost of living in big, crowded cities which is significantly/much/far higher than in smaller towns or rural areas. In order to cover their expenditures and support their family, most individuals, especially those of middle to low income or immigrants must work harder and harder, for more hours with higher pressure. Moreover, there is usually a lack of sense of community in big cities. As a result, people are likely to feel lonely and isolated from the society, which discourages them from building up any social relationships.
Furthermore, the health of urban populations is facing increasing threats due to toxic exposure from environment and food they consume. Indeed, exhaust fumes from personal vehicles and gas emissions from manufacturing plants have been the main culprit of air degradation and pollution in many big cities, more alarmingly in developing ones such as Beijing and Ho Chi Minh City. Consequently, the quality of air is often lower in these areas, giving rise to chronic diseases such as asthma, pneumonia and other respiratory problems. At the same time, food security and quality could also exacerbate urban citizens’ well-being. The more stressful life and the availability of fast food make busy people spend a lot of money on this kind of food and little time on doing exercises. To make it worse, healthy food is usually more expensive than unhealthy one, which encourages a lot of people, mostly the poor and low-income to consume a large amount of fast food per/each/every year.
In conclusion, I am convinced that urban life is threatening residents’ health. Governments should therefore take actions to reduce its problems as soon as possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Thang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Rabiya | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Rabiya | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34674922601 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23404215337 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640866873065 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9646888655 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.133333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195862149905 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651915529941 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603584532072 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131666666057 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820273024588 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.