The diagram below shows the process of glass making, from making new glass to recycling.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The illustration depicts the different steps involved in making new glass. Starting from making new glasses to recycling used ones.
The first step is gathering raw materials such as sand, soda ash, and limestone. In the next step, these materials are funneled and place into a large container. This is followed by melting them at an extremely high temperature that can reach up to 1400 degrees. The melted products are then made into either glass containers or sheets. These can be further converted into other products like liquid bottles, glass doors, mirrors or car’s windows.
The next phase of the process involves collecting glasses that were either recycled or thrown into garbage bins. These are then brought in a facility where the bottles are sorted into colors – clear, green and brown. To complete, used glasses and sorted bottles are melted and used once again to make new glasses.
In summary, the process of making glass start with collecting raw materials, funneling followed by melting and turning it into containers or sheets that are further converted into other products. Lastly, used and recycled glasses are sorted and melted again to be used in making new glasses.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what way has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 67
- Some people believe that longer prison sentences are the best way to decrease crime while others believe that there are alternative ways to decrease crime.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- Some people think that young people should choose their profession themselves Others believe that their parents should choose for them Discuss both views and give your own opinion 88
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in the five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 61
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in the five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, lastly, so, then, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15816326531 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42176094453 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566326530612 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6290012076 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.25 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218207643174 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981345585957 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867078011485 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175805621683 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0949827163061 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.