Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others beleive it is the only way to save these traditions. Discuss on both sides and give your opinion.
It is undoubted that nowadays cultural tour is becoming widespread among tourist, causing a highly debated issue. While some people proclaim that it is beneficial for development of traditions, opponents argue that it poses a danger to culture. Before presenting my own opinion, I will discuss both sides of this issue.
In the modern world, it is common for most countries to use their cultural customs and historical places as a source of tourists income. It caused a mixture of cultures, which has a negative impact in habits and customs of host country.In addition local residents also may adapt to the needs of modern society, in order to maxmize their monetary earnings. For example, many tribes of South America arrange their cultural events only for attracting tourists and nowadays it does not represents any sense.
However, without financial support, it is impossible for government to upkeep and develop these customs. Reconstruction of old buildings and organisation of cultural festivals also require much money, which could be only provided by tourist. It also can be dangerous for culture. Becuase everything has a tendecy to disappear, if nobody interested in it. In addition it also make country famous, providing more attention of tourists and causing the development of economy. Thus, making cultural traditions attractions aimed to tourist can be only way to preserve them.
On the whole, it still remains as unsolved issue, which could be resolved only in a case-by-case basis. However, I tend to believe that using customs as attraction for making money is a good way to develop them, but it should be reasonably boundary between economy and culture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-28 | Patel karan | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...t in habits and customs of host country.In addition local residents also may adapt...
^^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...n habits and customs of host country.In addition local residents also may adapt to the n...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'represent'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: represent
...cting tourists and nowadays it does not represents any sense. However, without financia...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'represent'
Suggestion: represent
...cting tourists and nowadays it does not represents any sense. However, without financia...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...sappear, if nobody interested in it. In addition it also make country famous, providing ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...y interested in it. In addition it also make country famous, providing more attentio...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, thus, while, for example, in addition, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1875 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77687939024 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610294117647 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.148592334 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.785714286 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2161626593 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732572645367 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663278989615 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126865200447 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365699431154 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.