It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to another political figure science and mathematics. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
It is opinionated that studying subjects such as Literature and History is more crucial than having Science and Mathematics in the curriculum. However, I believe that studying both theoretical as well as practical subjects is good for overall development of a pupil. In the further paragraphs, I will give some reasons to support my view.
First of all, having subjects such as History and Literature in the syllabus makes students aware of the origin of their nation, culture as well as religion. Moreover, by studying such subjects, they come to know about the sacrifices made by the freedom fighters to free their nation. Next, learning such subjects is mandatory if a child wants to appear in competitive exams for becoming the politician, lawyer or political figure.
On the other hand, Science and Mathematics are critical subjects too. Pursuing education in such subjects enables learners to have fruitful careers as doctors, scientists, and teachers, through which they can make advancements, innovations and new discoveries. Apart from this, these subjects broaden their thinking, and they stay away from superstition. When they know scientific reasoning behind every phenomenon, they shirk misconceptions.
In conclusion, schools are a place where overall grooming of a child occurs. Hence, History, Literature, Science, and Mathematics should be made mandatory up to the secondary level so that the children can have basic knowledge which is necessary. After that, students should be free to pick or drop subjects of their choice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... believe that studying both theoretical as well as practical subjects is good for overall ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, well, apart from, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41908713693 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9400031284 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618257261411 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.604852969 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.461538462 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.25397266985 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151140228818 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552219484086 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661917418737 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100247827811 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0953552931309 0.0609392437508 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.