Ways of communication were different 10 years back. How have this changed over the period? What are the pros and cons of these changes?
Remember the old days when postman used to deliver the letters, cards and parcels. I am not talking about the system existed centuries before, just ten years earlier. Although, good memories were related to those days but also some bad as well. For instance, receiving a letter from some relative was always be a pleasure moment but time delay was not that much a happy moment.
Communications have changed a lot over the past decade. More efficient and reliable system become available for the communications. If we consider the post office system, which is still in use for different parcel and other deliveries, letter system is completely obsolete now. Mobile phones and email have taken the position of the postman. Now, it takes only seconds for the transmission of the message or email. Similarly, in others field as well, for instance, a phone call to some relative, before it used to take a long time by calling an operator and passing all the information to the operator and then waiting for call to connect.
Discussing the benefits, undoubtably, modern ways of communications are faster, reliable and cost efficient. But, with all these pros we still have some cons in the system. Fast communication is good and important, but the systems companies are using are potentially hazardous for human and other living animals. The base station for a mobile communications company uses electromagnetic wave for the propagation of digital text and voice messages, which are dangerous for human body organs. These waves can cause cancers in human bodies, blind flying birds and cause interference with aeroplane systems.
Government and Other non-government organisations are making efforts to make these systems safer for the environment. In recent time these systems will have more benefits and fewer dangers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-16 | zeeshan | 80 | view |
| 2018-04-27 | ananddeepsingh | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... a letter from some relative was always be a pleasure moment but time delay was no...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, similarly, so, still, then, well, for instance, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 8.36945812808 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21088435374 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85128164601 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 139.433497537 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636054421769 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7188061815 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1176470588 104.977214359 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2941176471 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130209958386 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495632345519 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06891479817 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0716385035925 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288122349941 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.