What part do gender stereotypes play nowadays? In what way it is possible to change them?
In today's life, people are developing attitude of rigidness in terms of success and failure. There are many rigidness phases which developed and changed with growing in age. Some people believe that rigid attitude provide stairs of success and other people argue that it provides bad consequences on individual's life. In this essay, I shall discuss both views by analyzing this argument and explore a logical conclusion.
To start with, people accept some challenges to prove themselves that they are making their steps in correct direction. They believe in their action to get adequate knowledge and learning. For example person get inspiration from predecessor and form his attitude to fulfill their dream. Stereotypes play a profound and pivotal role and it must be exists while pursuing the road-map of success.
On contrary, people argue that stereotypes are bad and may influence the concentration of individual. They measure rigid attitude do not fulfill the accomplishment and secede the path to success. For example people engrace with rigid attitude follow the wrong road and indulge to introduce to sins which influences to indecent level of their life. People also argue that stereotypes must be secluded in adequate limit.
In recapitulate, while there strong facts for this argument. In my personal opinion, some bad stereotypes can be changed to give proper direction with knowledge which provide wisdom through-out in life.
- Is tourism in less developed countries advantage or disadvantage? Discuss your views and give your opinion. 65
- Some people believe law changes human behavior. Do you agree/disagree? 77
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? 72
- Talk about pros/cons of this era as it is full of daily inventions? 77
- Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person's age. In the workplace, These are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against older 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In todays life, people are developing at...
^^
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ue that it provides bad consequences on individuals life. In this essay, I shall discuss bo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment and explore a logical conclusion. To start with, people accept some challe...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hile pursuing the road-map of success. On contrary, people argue that stereotyp...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es must be secluded in adequate limit. In recapitulate, while there strong fact...
^^
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...e strong facts for this argument. In my personal opinion, some bad stereotypes can be changed to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, while, for example, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35682819383 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74481510761 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568281938326 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4398228411 50.4703680194 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.8571428571 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2142857143 20.9669160288 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 7.25397266985 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0598228333565 0.242375264174 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0236945109602 0.0925447433944 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286980585176 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0407105180629 0.151781067708 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0156711759747 0.0609392437508 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.