Poverty is a major issue worldwide. Many charities exist to help collect monetary donations. Who should decide what donations are spent on? The people in need or the charitable organisations? Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Poverty has long been a global issue and today cash donations are collected by various charities and distributed to those in need. Some people believes that charitable organisations should decide where to spend it. While others argue that it’s the needy people who should decide that where it’s required the most as they are part of that situation. I am inclined to believe that people who are in need can find the areas where that money is required the most and can make the best out of it. This essay will discuss why people who are in need should decide where to spent it rather than charitable organizations.
To commence with, people who are working with charitable organizations often come from the other countries and they may be not aware of the local context, subtlety of the particular region where they are temporarily placed. For instance, people do not know the conditions people live in Africa and what are their prime requirements and unable to take decision. Therefore, due to lack of knowledge and understanding of background charitable people can’t decide where money should spend.
On the flip side, people who are living in that situation can make wise decision to use that collected donations because they know about local surrounding and understand the realities. For instance, people from poor village know very well that they need to have better infrastructure, primary education and skill the local people. So, the people who are themselves living in poverty can utilise the donation amount in the best way possible and can rise above poverty.
In conclusion, the forgoing discussion propounds the view that it should be the poor people themselves who take control on their future by controlling the way in which donations are uses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-22 | Manisha Verma | 80 | view |
| 2018-05-22 | Manisha Verma | 80 | view |
| 2018-05-22 | Manisha Verma | 75 | view |
- It is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past, even if it will be expensive to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it. 80
- combat sports such as boxing are popular Some people believe that combat sports encourage violence while others believe they promote self-discipline and restraintsChoose which side you most agree with and discuss why you choose that position. Support your 85
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. 80
- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport 90
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 6.10837438424 278% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 5.94088669951 404% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08873720137 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67685601614 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532423208191 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7215111038 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.25 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258105874206 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1073168802 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404089168589 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154868085347 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522096559761 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.