The space travel is fantastic these days and people are very fascinated towards it but there are many environmental problems in our planet that need to be resolved first. What is your opinion? Should money be spent on space travel or on environmental issues?
Money being spent on space travel, which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The influence of spending money on space travel has sparked the controversy over the impact of this trend on the ability to spend money on environmental issues. It can be said that money can be spent on space travel, although some people believe that money should be spent on environmental issues. This essay will elaborate the benefits of spending money on both space travel and environmental issues and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are a number of reasons why expenditure on space travel is important, but the most preponderant one is to conserve world population. For example, a recent study suggests that if the population keeps growing at this rate, we will have no natural resources left, see animal’s natural habitat destroyed and smog up the earth’s atmosphere beyond what is breathable. Furthermore, space travel could bring a solution if astronauts could find other non-earth planets that can be colonized. Space travel is, therefore, play a vital role in conserving world population.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawback which can potentially overwhelm the potential impact of expenditure on space travel, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that many countries are enduring economic deprivation, which deserves immediate government funding. To illustrate, thousands of people in Africa are starving in default of basic necessities such as food and water. Money, therefore, could be diverted to this region to eliminate poverty and help the locals climb higher in social ladder instead of squandering on space travel.
From what has been discussed above, one can conclude that the importance of space travel is necessary to conserve earth’s population and the way government funding can help eliminate poverty should be well handled.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-05 | Alireza.r.m | 80 | view |
| 2020-02-28 | Alireza.r.m | 86 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | Mpaul | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | hemsingh81 | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-12 | mojtaba1980 | 80 | view |
- Cashless society is becoming a reality More and more people are using credit cards for payment and less people use cash How realistic do you think it is 79
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the western countries.” According to you what solutions can be proposed by government and individuals. 88
- Right amount of motivation and practice can teach one better than the training given to him in classrooms by teachers. 80
- In towns and cities large shopping malls should replace the small local shop Do you agree or disagree 86
- Should heritage buildings be preserved? Discuss your views. 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...le in Africa are starving in default of basic necessities such as food and water. Money, therefor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95032201632 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.8472619442 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370393254227 0.242375264174 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147452818048 0.0925447433944 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950873185348 0.071462118173 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214082415456 0.151781067708 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108488475816 0.0609392437508 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.