Do you agree or disagree? It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends.
There is a famous proverb that says, “Honesty is the best policy.” According to this proverb, being honest in all situations in the life, making it a utopia for any individual. However, there are some exceptions that are impossible to be completely honest with friends. I do believe that honesty depends on environment and condition in which we live and it is not plausible to do the same in different situations and facing with different individuals. I will completely elaborate on my standpoint in the following paragraphs.
The first and foremost reason is that usually there are some issues which are private in everyone’s life. Facing ones who are eager to know about our private life, it is better to conceal the truth. Indeed, being honest facing people who are not very close friends cause a great number of problems for us. For example, there are always people who want to know when we are going to marry or when we are going to complete our education. If people do not hide their own private life’s issues, it would lead to spreading rumors about their private life and encountering others’ interference in their life. Moreover, get into this negative situation may have a negative effect on individuals’ decision-making process, bringing new problems for them. For instance, because of other’s interference, ones may decide to engage with an inappropriate person and experience a bad marriage.
Secondly, it is also important to bear in mind that if we look at this issue from social aspects, saying truth regarding people’s feeling about their common friends may cause negative effects in their relationships. In another word, telling their wrong feeling about a friend’s behavior to another unreliable friend, people may destroy unwantedly their friendly relationship. In addition to this, in order to avoid problematic issues among people, in some situations it is better to do not say the truth. A well-known Persian proverb confirms this idea, “Many a white lie better than a seditious truth.” I mean, people should behave maturely against untrustworthy people and do not say the truth.
In conclusion, with all this taken into account, it can undoubtedly conclude that it is not plausible to say completely truth facing with everyone and everywhere. Because we all have some privacy issues in our lives and also, there may be inquisitive people around us eager for others’ private problems it is not make a sense to say always the truth. Moreover, facing unreliable people, it is strongly suggested that be cautious about close friends and friendly relationships.
- Do you agree or disagree? It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends. 76
- Some people prefer to live in the country. Others prefer to live in the town or big cities. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 73
- Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 73
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 817, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
..., because of other's interference, ones may decide to engage with an inappropri...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, i mean, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2222.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24056603774 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06731105635 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497641509434 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 698.4 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9243505646 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.444444444 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145998568179 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621083593798 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912494806896 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116928556155 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088848581683 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.