Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading presents some evidence indicating that Chevalier’s memoir is inaccurate due to some reasons.
The lecturer, however, finds all the idea mentioned by the reading dubious and offers some counterclaims to refute them all.
First, the author argues that Chevalier was not wealthy while living in Switzerland because he borrowed a great deal of money from a merchant.
Conversely, the speaker brings up the idea that this reason is highly questionable due to the fact that he needs to sell first his assets to spent in parties and gambling. Therefore, he had to wait to convert his possessions to money, and so borrowed some money from a merchant.
Second, the reading highlights the thought that conversations between Chevalier and a well-known writer Voltaire are inaccurate due to the fact that it is impossible to the captured detailed discussion after years.
The speaker, on the contrary, asserts that Chevalier recorded these conversations every night immediately after their discussion, and so he refers to those documents composing his memoirs.
Finally, the author holds the view that the story of the Chevalier’s escape from prison is inaccurate and he did not make a hole in the ceiling, but he had some well-connected politically friends and they help him to free him from prison.
In contrast, the speaker dismisses this idea due to the fact that there were a number of persons in prison who have some friends to help them, but they could not escape. However, Chevalier could be climbed out of his cell because he uses a piece of metal and escape. There are some old documents verifying this issue that the ceiling of the prison was repaired after his escaping.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | Opak Pulup | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
- Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Do you agree or disagree? It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends. 76
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 76
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 91
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08571428571 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87344456593 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528571428571 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2956721109 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.454545455 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.09492273731 195% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.034866235179 0.272083759551 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0156867303345 0.0996497079465 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0144178588553 0.0662205650399 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.019103968927 0.162205337803 12% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122142949711 0.0443174109184 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.