The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts give information about the rate of household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
Overall, therer are some differences between two pie charts.
In 1950, the rate of housing standed at first with 72,1 percent meanwhile in 2010 the most money was spent on food (34,0 percent). The proportion of healthcare in 2010 with 4.5 percent recorded a lager of healthcare than in 1950 with just 2.4 percent. Transportation in 2010 spent more money than 1950 to 14 percent. The rate of other in 1950 was a little lower than that in 2010 by 14,8 percent.
Similarly, the rate of education in 1950 was as high as that in 2010 with just 6,3 percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-15 | RockyGagKy | 78 | view |
| 2018-08-21 | A92 | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-21 | rzeeshan565 | 11 | view |
| 2018-06-15 | Lannhim | 56 | view |
| 2017-05-06 | NML | 84 | view |
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
- The graph below shows average yearly rainfall in Moscow and Sanfrancisco measured in millimeters 84
- The graph below show the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculities of major university in 2012 67
- School age children and teenagers usually like to do the same things as their friends but parents often have a different idea about what their children have a different idea about what their children should be doingShould pảents always decide how childr 56
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given.You should write at least 150 words. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 540.0 965.302439024 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 118.0 196.424390244 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57627118644 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.29587325169 3.73543355544 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58323100933 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 65.0 106.607317073 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550847457627 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 143.1 283.868780488 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.4331658169 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.1428571429 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17463813184 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109609114137 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111568402282 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146901052617 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136069412559 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.